Helped along by Jack O’Connor and the famous articles he wrote for Outdoor Life about the. 270 Weatherby Magnum, and the 6.8 Remington SPC, virtually no other mass produced cartridges use. 270 Winchester Short Magnum ( 270 WSM), the. 270 Winchester eventually became a gigantic commercial success for the company, aside from the. 284″ bullets. Regardless of their reasons though, the design team at Winchester went with that bullet diameter and the rest is history. It’s unclear exactly why Winchester opted for. 277″ bullets which undoubtedly hampered adoption of the cartridge to a certain degree. 280 Ackley Improved, and 7mm Remington Magnum), the. 284″ bullets like the 7mm Mauser (and more recently developed cartridges like the 7mm-08. 270 Winchester fired unusual size bullets. This was due to a number of reasons, one of which was the fact that the. 270 had a very high muzzle velocity compared to other popular cartridges of the day, it was not an instant commercial success. 30-06, read the article below:Ģ70 vs 30-06 Debate Settled Once And For All 270 Winchester compares to its parent case in the. 270 Winchester load shot a 130 grain bullet at a velocity of 3,140 feet per second (2,846 ft-lbs of energy). 270 Winchester cartridge in 1925 with the Winchester Model 54 rifle. However, the folks at Winchester went the opposite route and necked down the. 30-06 to develop bigger cartridges like the. 30-06 from the start, wildcatters also quickly started modifying the cartridge for more specialized tasks. Some gun designers necked up the. 30-06 Springfield was an almost instant success in the civilian market. 30-06 Springfield was a gigantic improvement over other popular American cartridges used during that era like the. Using smokeless powder and a 150gr pointed bullet fired at 2,700fps, the. Those efforts bore fruit a few years later with the bolt action 1903 Springfield rifle chambered in the new. The US Army began the search for a new rifle and cartridge after receiving a deadly demonstration of the capabilities of the revolutionary new Mauser rifle and 7mm Mauser cartridge in the hands of Spanish troops in Cuba during 1898. Like many other cartridges developed in the United States, the story of the. 308 vs 270 PodcastĪpple | Google | iHeart | Spotify | Stitcher 270 vs 308: History If you’d rather listen than read, click the appropriate link below to listen to this episode on your preferred podcasting service. Thanks for your support.įinally, I recorded an entire podcast episode on this exact subject.
#Rifle recoil table 308 free#
This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. This means I will earn a small commission (at no extra cost to you) if you make a purchase. Some of the links below are affiliate links. 308 each have very devoted fan clubs can also make it difficult to navigate the debate.ĭon’t get discouraged though: in today’s blog post, I’m going to discuss the pros and cons of the 270 vs 308 so you can make an informed decision on which one is best for you.īefore we get started, I have a couple of administrative notes: For those reasons, understanding their true strengths and weaknesses can be pretty confusing at times. While each cartridge offers certain benefits to hunters, there is also a pretty big overlap in their capabilities. Indeed, they’re both consistently among the most popular centerfire rifle cartridges used in the United States each year for good reason. 308 Winchester are outstanding hunting cartridges. I think the majority of hunters and shooters would agree that the. So, the question central to the 270 vs 308 debate remains: which one should you be hunting with? 270 Winchester cartridges are both proven performers. While they each have different strengths and weaknesses, .308 and.